I am
conducting an on-going on-line survey regarding Sleep-Related Female Orgasms
and Sex Dreams. I need responses
from women of all ages, especially ages 60 and above. If you would like to participate, please click
here.

Due
to increasing interest, I recently published my doctoral dissertation on Sleep-Related Female Orgasms: A Survey of Biological, Psychological,
Sociological, and Cultural Factors, in
book form. It is available at my e-store
for $16.00 plus postage, by clicking on the title, or by ordering directly from
Amazon.com. This material
is copyrighted. Please contact me if you would like more information.
This
page includes the Abstract, Introduction, and a modified Table of Contents for
those who might be interested in this topic. This
Return to my sex therapy and
coaching page
The study summarizes what is known about SRFOs
based on existing research and historical opinion in fields of sexology,
physiology, psychology, sleep, dreaming, anthropology and spirituality. While Kinsey noted that there is no single
factor or cluster of factors that is predictive of SRFOs
in an individual history, the strongest predictors in his research were
frequent waking orgasm and “erotic responsiveness,” low availability of other
psycho-sexual outlets, masturbation, and fantasy during masturbation (Kinsey et
al. 1953, 212-15). Today research
suggests that overall, sleep mentations are more
continuous than compensatory, and that sexual content and orgasmic experience
during sleep are more likely among women who think about sex when awake. Waking cognitions include memory, fantasy,
desire, imagination, prosexual attitudes, knowledge
of SRFOs, and familiarity/safety with sexual pleasure
and the orgasmic reflex. It is likely
that formal education, intelligence, personality characteristics, and other
cultural factors also influence these sleep mentations. Orgasmic responses during sleep seem more
likely when there is some level of autonomic nervous system arousal before
sleep, including both psychological and physiological elements. Physiological elements include lingering
arousal from waking orgasms or other sexual behavior; however, this arousal may
also be due to hormonal fluctuations, physical exercise, or emotional states
such as anxiety, or anger. In these
latter cases, SRFOs might serve a compensatory role
in maintaining system homeostasis. It
is likely that SRFOs occur more frequently among
lucid dreamers due to possible neurological conditions unique to the lucid
dream state, and the conscious freedom to exercise volition by choosing
pleasure. SRFOs
appear to be neither unhealthy nor rare.
Findings of the study suggest that the term female nocturnal orgasms needs to be replaced with the term Sleep-Related
Female Orgasms, which is a more accurate designation of the phenomenon
since these occurrences are diurnal as well as nocturnal. Additionally, the
researcher lists twenty-seven possible hypotheses based on an extensive
literature review that could be used in future research on the topic, and
recommends that the topic be included in sex education classes for adolescents
and continuing education modules for heath care professionals.
Erotic dreams among women have been documented since the
early Greek civilization; however, only in the past one hundred years have
researchers begun to study the incidence and dynamics of sleep-related female orgasms
(Kinsey et al. 1953, 191). While it is
widely known that most men occasionally experience wet dreams, it
appears that many adults in contemporary American culture are unaware that many
women experience sleep-related orgasms.
Given the prevalence of these responses (37 percent of women by age
forty-five in Kinsey et al. 1953, and likely higher now),
this lack of awareness is somewhat surprising.
Realistically, however, this topic is rarely discussed. In addition, as will be shown, the
dynamics and etiology of these female sleep-related orgasms are somewhat
different than the nocturnal emissions of men.
Interest in this topic began while testing sample survey
questions for a different topic. The
issue of female sleep and dream-related orgasms kept surfacing. Two respondents reported that they mentioned
these occurrences to their male therapists only to be told that the therapists
had “never heard of such a thing.”
Subsequent inquiries have revealed that this is not unusual. An informal survey by this writer suggests
that in 2005, approximately 70 percent of men did not know that women could
experience sleep-related orgasms. It is
even more surprising that a significant percentage of women, in excess of 25
percent, lacked this information.
Informal inquiries also suggest that women, who do
experience sleep-related orgasms, enjoy them.
This writer recently spoke to a mixed-sex group, ages twenties through
sixties, and mentioned that while Kinsey found that the active incidence of
female sleep-related orgasms peaked in the forty and fifty age decades, the
accumulated
incidence
continued to increase throughout the lifespan (Kinsey et al. 1953). The women in the group started cheering! Dream therapist Gayle Delaney reports that
she has “never heard a woman tell about an orgasmic
dream that was not pleasurable” (Delaney 1994, 26). Kinsey and others have also noted this
favorable reaction.
Therefore, one question this paper will address is simply, “Why
don’t more people know that women can, and do, experience sleep-related
orgasms?” Obviously, lack of education
plays a role. Contemporary sex education
classes teach boys “such terms as ‘nocturnal emission’ . . . without a parallel
terminology for girls’ own nighttime orgasm” (Sweeney 1999). Although Kinsey found that 5 percent of his
female respondents experienced their first orgasm as a sleep-generated orgasm
(Kinsey et al. 1953, 193), this topic is not included in recommended sex
education curriculums of any organization reviewed by this author for inclusion
at any age level (i.e., American Academy of Pediatrics, 2001, Sexuality
Information and Education Council of the United States, 1996, Kempner [SIECUS]
2003). Likewise, it is not included in
literature from common public sex education forums such as Planned Parenthood
(www.plannedparenthood.org). Virtually
all curriculums and information sources include commentary regarding male
nocturnal emissions. One might conclude
that women typically learn about sleep-related female orgasms through
experience, although this hypothesis has not been tested. And there still is no accurate, standardized
terminology for this experience in the research or educational literature.
A common initial response to the above-mentioned question is
that this is another example of how attention to women’s health has been
neglected by the culture and mainstream researchers. The field of sexology has not been immune from
this charge, as pointed out by Janice Irvine in Disorders of Desire: Sex and Gender in Modern American Sexology:
Scientific sexology responds to feminism by
minimizing it. The “ignore it and it’ll
go away” approach characterizes an enormous cross-section of American
sexology. This tactic, perhaps the most
dangerous, is reflected in the virtual absence of feminist analysis and scholarship within sexual science . . . Structural aspects of
sexology perpetuate male dominance and inhibit feminist intervention.”
(Irvine 1990, 144-5)
This topic lies clearly within the scope of sexology; yet, it interfaces
and penetrates other fields of inquiry more deeply than many other sexological
topics. While research is therefore more
complex, it will ultimately provide greater sexological insight. In addition to the normal physiological,
psychological, and cultural variables that relate to sexological research, the
fields of sleep physiology, dreaming, consciousness, anthropology, and
spirituality contribute to awareness and understanding of this phenomenon. The mind-body relationship comes to the
forefront providing sharp contrast to the emphasis on “structural aspects of
sexology” mentioned by
Yet, it would be misleading to attribute the lack of awareness
of sleep-related female orgasms to research and educational neglect alone. This topic has commanded much attention
during other periods of Western civilization.
Unfortunately, as was the case for sleep, dreams, and sex in general,
the attention was based largely on superstition, fear, and moral judgment. The most severe consequences came during the
three hundred year witch-burning epoch, mandated by the 1486 publication of the
Catholic Church-initiated document, the Malleus
Maleficarum of Kramer and Sprenger
(Stewart 2002, 17-19; Masters 1966).
By the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the sexual
discourse had shifted more fully back into the medical model, its domain during
the Greek and Roman periods, prior to the Christian church (Foucault, 1978,
1985). While the nature of the moral
judgments and physical punishments changed, sleep-related female orgasms, like spermatorrhea (male emissions) and masturbation, were
nonetheless viewed as both psychologically and physiologically pathological (Tissot 1758, and others including Freud 1900) until the
1920s, when they were then thought to be biologically compensatory for lack of
other satisfactory sexual outlets (Kinsey et al. 1953, 207). To a great extent,
Kinsey’s data dispelled the compensatory imperative as a primary causative
factor, thus leaving confusion, mystery, and relative silence. The dominant theory since Kinsey’s time could
be called the system maintenance model (Reinisch
1990, 89), which implies a randomness not really supported by the meager
information at hand.
As Charles Stewart of the
Royal Anthropological Institute points out:
Erotic dreams have raised perennial questions
about the boundaries of the self and individual’s ability to control and
produce this self. Do erotic dreams
result from divine intercession, an immoral life, or recent memories? Are they products of the self for which the
individual dreamer may be held responsible?
Or are they determined by a force majeure such as original sin, or human
physiology? (Stewart 2002, 2)
This paper provides literature review research regarding
Sleep-Related Female Orgasms (SRFOs) and factors
associated with these responses, research regarding the dynamics of female sex
dreams (which often precede SRFOs), the history of
attitudes and cultural responses toward SRFOs, and
possible reasons why knowledge of SRFOs is apparently
withheld from both men and women. It will explore social, behavioral,
physiological, psychological, spiritual, moral, and political factors that
influence and relate to this response, and make recommendations regarding
further research and educational initiatives.
INTRODUCTION...1
CHAPTER 1: DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES...6
CHAPTER 2: A
REVIEW OF CONTEMPORARY SURVEY RESEARCH...15
CHAPTER 3: THE
PHYSIOLOGY OF SLEEP-RELATED FEMALE ORGASMS...28
CHAPTER 4:
BEHAVIORAL FACTORS RELATED TO SRFOs...54
CHAPTER 5: THE
ROLE OF DREAMS IN SRFOs...68
CHAPTER 5:
OTHER PSYCHOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL FACTORS RELATED TO SRFOs...90
CHAPTER 7:
SPIRITUAL, RELIGIOUS, SOCIAL, AND POLITICAL CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING SRFOs...114
CHAPTER 8: SUMMARY
AND RECOMMENDATIONS...145
Dream Incubation –
by Gillian Holloway, PhD...161
REFERENCES...163